↓ Skip to main content

As Bad as it Gets: How Climate Damage Functions Affect Growth and the Social Cost of Carbon

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental and Resource Economics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
As Bad as it Gets: How Climate Damage Functions Affect Growth and the Social Cost of Carbon
Published in
Environmental and Resource Economics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10640-018-0219-y
Authors

Lucas Bretschger, Aimilia Pattakou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 31 36%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,847,231
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#100
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,024
of 453,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.