↓ Skip to main content

Regeneration: Stem Cells and Beyond

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Amphibian regeneration and stem cells.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Amphibian regeneration and stem cells.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Regeneration: Stem Cells and Beyond
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-18846-6_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-262321-9, 978-3-64-218846-6
Authors

Stocum DL, D. L. Stocum, Stocum, D. L.

Abstract

Larval and adult urodeles and anuran tadpoles readily regenerate their limbs via a process of histolysis and dedifferentiation of mature cells local to the amputation surface that accumulate under the wound epithelium as a blastema of stem cells. These stem cells require growth and trophic factors from the apical epidermal cap (AEC) and the nerves that re-innervate the blastema for their survival and proliferation. Members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family synthesized by both AEC and nerves, and glial growth factor, substance P, and transferrin of nerves are suspected survival and proliferation factors. Stem cells derived from fibroblasts and muscle cells can transdifferentiate into other cell types during regeneration. The regeneration blastema is a self-organizing system based on positional information inherited from parent limb cells. Retinoids, which act through nuclear receptors, have been used in conjunction with assays for cell adhesivity to show that positional identity of blastema cells is encoded in the cell surface. These molecules are involved in the cell-cell signaling network that re-establishes the original structural pattern of the limb. Other systems of interest that regenerate by histolysis and dedifferentiation of pigmented epithelial cells are the neural retina and lens. Members of the FGF family are also important to the regeneration of these structures. The mechanism of amphibian regeneration by dedifferentiation is of importance to the development of a regenerative medicine, since understanding this mechanism may offer insights into how we might chemically induce the regeneration of mammalian tissues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Slovenia 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Chemistry 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#200
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,288
of 132,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.