↓ Skip to main content

Computational Biology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computational Biology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Sequencing and Genome Assembly Using Next-Generation Technologies
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 RNA Structure Prediction
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Normalization of Gene-Expression Microarray Data
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Prediction of transmembrane topology and signal peptide given a protein's amino acid sequence.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Protein Structure Modeling
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Template-Based Protein Structure Modeling
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Automated Protein NMR Structure Determination in Solution
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Computational Tools in Protein Crystallography
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 3-D Structures of Macromolecules Using Single-Particle Analysis in EMAN
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Computational Design of Chimeric Protein Libraries for Directed Evolution
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Mass Spectrometric Protein Identification Using the Global Proteome Machine
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Unbiased Detection of Posttranslational Modifications Using Mass Spectrometry
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Protein quantitation using mass spectrometry.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Modeling Experimental Design for Proteomics
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Functional Proteomic Study of the Trypanosoma brucei Nuclear Pore Complex: An Informatic Strategy
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Inference of Signal Transduction Networks from Double Causal Evidence
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Reverse engineering gene regulatory networks related to quorum sensing in the plant pathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Parameter Inference and Model Selection in Signaling Pathway Models
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Genetic Algorithms and Their Application to In Silico Evolution of Genetic Regulatory Networks
Attention for Chapter 6: Template-Based Protein Structure Modeling
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Template-Based Protein Structure Modeling
Chapter number 6
Book title
Computational Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-842-3_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-841-6, 978-1-60761-842-3
Authors

Fiser A, Andras Fiser, Fiser, Andras

Abstract

Functional characterization of a protein is often facilitated by its 3D structure. However, the fraction of experimentally known 3D models is currently less than 1% due to the inherently time-consuming and complicated nature of structure determination techniques. Computational approaches are employed to bridge the gap between the number of known sequences and that of 3D models. Template-based protein structure modeling techniques rely on the study of principles that dictate the 3D structure of natural proteins from the theory of evolution viewpoint. Strategies for template-based structure modeling will be discussed with a focus on comparative modeling, by reviewing techniques available for all the major steps involved in the comparative modeling pipeline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 365 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 20%
Student > Master 60 16%
Student > Bachelor 59 16%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 95 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 118 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 19%
Chemistry 24 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 105 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,800,155
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#536
of 13,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,093
of 97,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.