You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Galactic Winds and the Role Played by Massive Stars
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 23 |
Book title |
Handbook of Supernovae
|
Published in |
ADS, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-21846-5_23 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-921845-8, 978-3-31-921846-5
|
Authors |
Timothy M. Heckman, Todd A. Thompson, Heckman, Timothy M., Thompson, Todd A. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 43% |
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 71% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,544,407
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,313
of 37,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,668
of 421,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#189
of 1,890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,443 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.