↓ Skip to main content

Handbook of ELISPOT

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Handbook of ELISPOT'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Unique Strengths of ELISPOT for T Cell Diagnostics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The Impact of Harmonization on ELISPOT Assay Performance
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Equine ELISPOT Assay to Study Secretion of IFNγ and IL-4 from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Utilization of Feline ELISPOT for Mapping Vaccine Epitopes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Analyzing cellular immunity to AAV in a canine model using ELISPOT assay.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Dual- and Triple-Color Fluorospot
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 ELISPOT Assay as a Tool to Study Oxidative Stress in Lymphocytes
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 ELISPOT Assay for Neuroscience Research: Studying TNFα Secretion from Microglial Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 ELISPOT Assay as a Tool to Study the Effects of Stem Cells on Cytokine Secretion
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Combining ELISPOT and ELISA to measure amounts of cytokines secreted by a single cell.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 How ELISPOT Morphology Reflects on the Productivity and Kinetics of Cells’ Secretory Activity
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Mathematical Algorithms for Automatic Search, Recognition, and Detection of Spots in ELISPOT Assay
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Objective, User-Independent ELISPOT Data Analysis Based on Scientifically Validated Principles
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Statistical Analysis of ELISPOT Assays
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Response Determination Criteria for ELISPOT: Toward a Standard that Can Be Applied Across Laboratories
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Detection of Vaccinia Virus-Specific IFNγ and IL-10 Secretion from Human PBMCs and CD8 + T Cells by ELISPOT
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 ELISPOT Assays to Enumerate Bovine IFN-γ-Secreting Cells for the Development of Novel Vaccines Against Bovine Tuberculosis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Handbook of ELISPOT
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Overview of Membranes and Membrane Plates Used in Research and Diagnostic ELISPOT Assays
Attention for Chapter 10: Combining ELISPOT and ELISA to measure amounts of cytokines secreted by a single cell.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Combining ELISPOT and ELISA to measure amounts of cytokines secreted by a single cell.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Handbook of ELISPOT
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-325-7_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-324-0, 978-1-61779-325-7
Authors

Hagen J, Houchins JP, Kalyuzhny AE, Jodi Hagen, Jeffrey P. Houchins, Alexander E. Kalyuzhny

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay allows for the determination of the frequency of -cytokine-secreting cells, but does not answer the question of how much cytokine is secreted per cell. In our study, we combined ELISPOT and ELISA assays and developed a protocol to calculate the amount of IFN gamma secreted by each cell. A suspension of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells was split into two pools and cells from one pool were cultured in a regular ELISPOT plate, whereas cells from the other pool were cultured in an uncoated, "blank," ELISPOT plate. After finishing the incubations, the amount of IFN gamma was measured by ELISA in culture media collected from both plates. The "blank" plate served to measure a total amount of secreted IFN gamma, whereas the ELISPOT plate served to measure the amount of unbound (UB) IFN gamma. Subtracting the amount of unbound IFN gamma from its total amount and dividing it by the number of spots in the ELISPOT plate allows for the calculation of the average amount of IFN gamma in a spot formed by a single cell.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 36%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,316,776
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,322
of 13,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,491
of 131,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#19
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.