↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Mercury in the San Francisco Estuary
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Mercury in the San Francisco Estuary
Chapter number 2
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-74816-0_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-387-74815-3, 978-0-387-74816-0
Authors

Christopher H. Conaway, Frank J. Black, Thomas M. Grieb, Sujoy Roy, A. Russell Flegal, Conaway, Christopher H., Black, Frank J., Grieb, Thomas M., Roy, Sujoy, Flegal, A. Russell

Abstract

This review presents some of the published and other important literature on mercury contamination in San Francisco Estuary. Studies on human consumption of contaminated sportfish and on detecting ecological impacts of this contamination in wetland areas validate concerns regarding mercury's toxicity in this system. Mining, industrial, and environmental uses of mercury have occurred for more than a century, resulting in its large historic and continuing transport to the estuary. Consequently, there is a widespread distribution in the estuary, but more work is needed to show its relative chemical and biological availability from these sources. The uptake of mercury in the estuary has been shown in phytoplankton, but studies on biomagnification in local food webs have yet to draw a clear path to impairment in sportfish and waterbirds. In light of these concerns of impairment and the need for further information, large restoration activities planned for the estuary will require new technical approaches to solve important management questions, such as the location of key areas of methylmercury production.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 14%
Unknown 31 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 17%
Engineering 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,977,154
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#73
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,918
of 403,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.