↓ Skip to main content

Lesser Known Large dsDNA Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: The Phycodnaviridae: The Story of How Tiny Giants Rule the World
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Phycodnaviridae: The Story of How Tiny Giants Rule the World
Chapter number 1
Book title
Lesser Known Large dsDNA Viruses
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-68618-7_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-068617-0, 978-3-54-068618-7
Authors

W. H. Wilson, James L. Van Etten, M. J. Allen, J. L. Van Etten, Wilson, W. H., Etten, James L., Allen, M. J.

Abstract

The family Phycodnaviridae encompasses a diverse and rapidly expanding collection of large icosahedral, dsDNA viruses that infect algae. These lytic and lysogenic viruses have genomes ranging from 160 to 560 kb. The family consists of six genera based initially on host range and supported by sequence comparisons. The family is monophyletic with branches for each genus, but the phycodnaviruses have evolutionary roots that connect them with several other families of large DNA viruses, referred to as the nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDV). The phycodnaviruses have diverse genome structures, some with large regions of noncoding sequence and others with regions of ssDNA. The genomes of members in three genera in the Phycodnaviridae have been sequenced. The genome analyses have revealed more than 1000 unique genes, with only 14 homologous genes in common among the three genera of phycodnaviruses sequenced to date. Thus, their gene diversity far exceeds the number of so-called core genes. Not much is known about the replication of these viruses, but the consequences of these infections on phytoplankton have global affects, including influencing geochemical cycling and weather patterns.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 164 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 23%
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 16%
Environmental Science 18 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,207,053
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#182
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,159
of 400,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#12
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.