↓ Skip to main content

Imported Virus Infections

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Imported Virus Infections'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Imported vector- and rodent-borne virus infections — an introduction
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 WHO program on emerging virus diseases
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Arboviruses as imported disease agents: the need for increased awareness
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Arboviruses causing neurological disorders in the central nervous system
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Sandfly fever viruses in Italy
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Vector-borne viral diseases in Sweden--a short review.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Travel-related vector-borne virus infections in Germany
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Imported tropical virus infections in Germany
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Emerging and reemerging of filoviruses.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Characterization of a new Marburg virus isolated from a 1987 fatal case in Kenya.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Experimental infection of cynomolgus macaques with Ebola-Reston filoviruses from the 1989-1990 U.S. epizootic.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Passive immunization of Ebola virus-infected cynomolgus monkeys with immunoglobulin from hyperimmune horses
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Patients infected with high-hazard viruses: scientific basis for infection control.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Relative importance of the enterically transmitted human hepatitis viruses type A and E as a cause of foreign travel associated hepatitis
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Significance of imported hepatitis B virus infections
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Genotypes of hepatitis C virus isolates from different parts of the world
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 HIV-1 subtype O: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and perspectives of the evolution of HIV
Attention for Chapter 6: Vector-borne viral diseases in Sweden--a short review.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Vector-borne viral diseases in Sweden--a short review.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Imported Virus Infections
Published in
Archives of virology Supplementum, January 1996
DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-7482-1_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-21-182829-8, 978-3-70-917482-1
Authors

B Niklasson, S Vene, B. Niklasson, S. Vene, Niklasson, B., Vene, S.

Abstract

Ockelbo disease, caused by a Sindbis-related virus transmitted to man by mosquitoes, was first described in the central part of Sweden in the 1960s as clusters of patients with fever, arthralgia and rash. An average annual rate of 30 cases was recorded in the 1980s but no cases have been diagnosed during the last few years. Nephropathia epidemica (NE) characterized by fever, abdominal pain and renal dysfunction has been known to cause considerable morbidity in Sweden during the last 60 years but the etiologic agent (Puumala virus) was not isolated until 1983. This virus's main reservoir is the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). NE is endemic in the northern two thirds of Sweden where more than a hundred cases are diagnosed each year. Tick-borne encephalitis transmitted by Ixodes ricinus ticks is restricted to the archipelago and Lake M-alaren on the east coast close to Stockholm. Between 30 and 110 cases are diagnosed every year. Inkoo virus, a California encephalitis group virus, has been isolated from mosquitoes in Sweden. The antibody prevalence to Inkoo virus is very high in a normal population, but no disease has as yet been associated with this virus in Sweden. Among the vector-borne virus diseases imported to Sweden, dengue is the most important, with approximately 50 cases recorded every year.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Chile 1 4%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 36%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,248,338
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Archives of virology Supplementum
#21
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,931
of 79,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of virology Supplementum
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.