↓ Skip to main content

Methods in Molecular Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Stable transformation of plant cells by particle bombardment/biolistics.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Stable transformation of plant cells by particle bombardment/biolistics.
Book title
Transgenic Plants: Methods and Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2004
DOI 10.1385/1-59259-827-7:061
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-263-6, 978-1-59259-827-4
Authors

Kikkert JR, Vidal JR, Reisch BI, Kikkert, Julie R., Vidal, José R., Reisch, Bruce I.

Abstract

Particle bombardment, or biolistics, is a commonly used method for genetic transformation of plants and other organisms. Millions of DNA-coated metal particles are shot at target cells or tissues using a biolistic device or gene gun. The DNA elutes off the particles that lodge inside the cells, and a portion may be stably incorporated in the host chromosomes. A protocol for the generation of transgenic grapevines via biolistic transformation of embryogenic cell suspension cultures is detailed in this chapter. In a typical experiment, transient gene expression averaged nearly 8000 "hits" per bombarded plate. Five months after bombardment, there were nearly five putative transgenic embryos per bombarded plate. About half of the embryos were regenerated into confirmed transgenic plants. The basic bombardment procedures described are applicable to a wide range of plant genotypes, especially those for which embryogenic cell cultures are available. All users of particle bombardment technology will find numerous useful tips to maximize the success of transformation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Myanmar 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Student > Master 24 12%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 51 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 60 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,833,252
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#263
of 13,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,472
of 58,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them