↓ Skip to main content

New Perspectives in Regeneration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 305: Wound Healing in Mammals and Amphibians: Toward Limb Regeneration in Mammals.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Wound Healing in Mammals and Amphibians: Toward Limb Regeneration in Mammals.
Chapter number 305
Book title
New Perspectives in Regeneration
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/82_2012_305
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-235809-8, 978-3-64-235810-4
Authors

Kawasumi A, Sagawa N, Hayashi S, Yokoyama H, Tamura K, Aiko Kawasumi, Natsume Sagawa, Shinichi Hayashi, Hitoshi Yokoyama, Koji Tamura, Kawasumi, Aiko, Sagawa, Natsume, Hayashi, Shinichi, Yokoyama, Hitoshi, Tamura, Koji

Abstract

Mammalian fetal skin regenerates perfectly, but adult skin repairs by the formation of scar tissue. The cause of this imperfect repair by adult skin is not understood. In contrast, wounded adult amphibian (urodeles and anurans) skin is like mammalian fetal skin in that it repairs by regeneration, not scarring. Scar-free wound repair in adult Xenopus is associated with expression of the paired homeobox transcription factor Prx1 by mesenchymal cells of the wound, a feature shared by mesenchymal cells of the regeneration blastema of the axolotl limb. Furthermore, mesenchymal cells of Xenopus skin wounds that harbor the mouse Prx1-limb-enhancer as a transgene exhibit activation of the enhancer despite the fact that they are Xenopus cells, suggesting that the mouse Prx1 enhancer possesses all elements required for its activation in skin wound healing, even though activation of the same enhancer in the mouse is not seen in the wounded skin of an adult mouse. Elucidation of the role of the Prx1 gene in amphibian skin wound healing will help to clarify the molecular mechanisms of scarless wound healing. Shifting the molecular mechanism of wound repair in mammals to that of amphibians, including reactivation of the Prx1-limb-enhancer, will be an important clue to stimulate scarless wound repair in mammalian adult skin. Finding or creating Prx1-positive stem cells in adult mammal skin by activating the Prx1-limb-enhancer may be a fast and reliable way to provide for scarless skin wound repair, and even directly lead to limb regeneration in mammals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Researcher 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 42 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Engineering 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 43 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,720,510
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#71
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,861
of 284,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.