↓ Skip to main content

Stem Cell Microenvironments and Beyond

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Plasticity of the Muscle Stem Cell Microenvironment
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Plasticity of the Muscle Stem Cell Microenvironment
Chapter number 8
Book title
Stem Cell Microenvironments and Beyond
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69194-7_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-969193-0, 978-3-31-969194-7
Authors

Ivana Dinulovic, Regula Furrer, Christoph Handschin

Abstract

Satellite cells (SCs) are adult muscle stem cells capable of repairing damaged and creating new muscle tissue throughout life. Their functionality is tightly controlled by a microenvironment composed of a wide variety of factors, such as numerous secreted molecules and different cell types, including blood vessels, oxygen, hormones, motor neurons, immune cells, cytokines, fibroblasts, growth factors, myofibers, myofiber metabolism, the extracellular matrix and tissue stiffness. This complex niche controls SC biology-quiescence, activation, proliferation, differentiation or renewal and return to quiescence. In this review, we attempt to give a brief overview of the most important players in the niche and their mutual interaction with SCs. We address the importance of the niche to SC behavior under physiological and pathological conditions, and finally survey the significance of an artificial niche both for basic and translational research purposes.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Engineering 5 16%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2017.
All research outputs
#13,339,172
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,829
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,353
of 421,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#159
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.