You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Photoacoustic Tomography for Imaging Nanoparticles
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Cancer Nanotechnology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-608-5, 978-1-60761-609-2
|
Authors |
Zhen Yuan, Huabei Jiang, Yuan, Zhen, Jiang, Huabei |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 29% |
Researcher | 4 | 19% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 5 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 14% |
Engineering | 3 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,542,164
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,339
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,809
of 164,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#38
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.