You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Genome-Wide Analysis of Methylation in Bovine Clones by Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP)
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 20 |
| Book title |
Nuclear Reprogramming
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1594-1_20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1593-4, 978-1-4939-1594-1
|
| Authors |
Hélène Kiefer, Kiefer, Hélène |
| Editors |
Nathalie Beaujean, Hélène Jammes, Alice Jouneau |
| Abstract |
Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP), when coupled to high-throughput sequencing or microarray hybridization, allows for the identification of methylated loci at a genome-wide scale. Genomic regions affected by incomplete reprogramming after nuclear transfer can potentially be delineated by comparing the MeDIP profiles of bovine clones and non-clones. This chapter presents a MeDIP protocol largely inspired from Mohn and colleagues (Mohn et al., Methods Mol Biol 507:55-64, 2009), with PCR primers specific for cattle, and when possible, overviews of experimental designs adapted to the comparison between clones and non-clones. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,246,428
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,866
of 13,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,648
of 352,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#635
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,091 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.