You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
In Vitro Induction of Hypoxia/Reoxygenation on Placental Cells: A Suitable Model for Understanding Placental Diseases. - PubMed - NCBI
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 21 |
| Book title |
Preeclampsia
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7498-6_21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7497-9, 978-1-4939-7498-6
|
| Authors |
Lucas Sagrillo-Fagundes, Laetitia Laurent, Josianne Bienvenue-Pariseault, Cathy Vaillancourt, Sagrillo-Fagundes, Lucas, Laurent, Laetitia, Bienvenue-Pariseault, Josianne, Vaillancourt, Cathy |
| Abstract |
Lack of blood flow and aberrant levels of oxygenation in placentas are recurrent in pregnancy diseases, such as preeclampsia. These alterations generate situations of hypoxia and hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) and consequent oxidative stress, increased cell death, and inflammation in trophoblasts. The models used to understand the effects of hypoxia and H/R on trophoblasts require a rather big structure. This chapter describes the details of a suitable and reasonable approach with hypoxia chambers to expose human placental trophoblasts to variable conditions of oxygenation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,962
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,497
of 442,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.