↓ Skip to main content

Cartilage and Osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: High-resolution imaging of osteoarthritis using microcomputed tomography.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
High-resolution imaging of osteoarthritis using microcomputed tomography.
Book title
Cartilage and Osteoarthritis
Published in
Methods in molecular medicine, August 2004
DOI 10.1385/1-59259-821-8:231
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-505-7, 978-1-59259-821-2
Authors

Wachsmuth L, Engelke K, Lydia Wachsmuth, Klaus Engelke

Abstract

Three-dimensional imaging of osteoarthritis is so far limited to late stages of the disease. In this chapter we introduce microcomputed tomography (microCT) as a new imaging tool that offers exciting features for diagnosis of earlier disease stages and for disease monitoring. microCT provides spatial resolution better than 100 microm, but the size of the objects that can be scanned is restricted to several centimeters. The strength of X-ray-based techniques like micro CT is the excellent visualization of bone. Therefore, the main application of microCT in osteoarthritis (OA) will be the analysis of bone in small-animal models or of human bone biopsies. As an example, we will exemplarily describe the application of microCT for the examination of knee joints of male STR1N mice. This inbred strain spontaneously develops OA that carries many characteristics of the human disease. With microCT it is possible to monitor the prominent bony alterations such as osteophyte formation, trabecular remodeling, subchondral bone plate thickening, and subchondral sclerosis. We discuss sample preparation, scanning procedures, data processing, and analysis as well as implications and restrictions for in vivo and in vitro applications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 30%
Engineering 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,243,777
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular medicine
#48
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,518
of 57,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular medicine
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.