↓ Skip to main content

Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications in neuroscience.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications in neuroscience.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2080-8_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2079-2, 978-1-4939-2080-8
Authors

Mostany R, Miquelajauregui A, Shtrahman M, Portera-Cailliau C, Ricardo Mostany, Amaya Miquelajauregui, Matthew Shtrahman, Carlos Portera-Cailliau

Editors

Peter J. Verveer

Abstract

Two-photon excitation (2PE) overcomes many challenges in fluorescence microscopy. Compared to confocal microscopy, 2PE microscopy improves depth penetration, owing to the longer excitation wavelength required and to the ability to collect scattered emission photons as a useful signal. It also minimizes photodamage because lower energy photons are used and because fluorescence is confined to the geometrical focus of the laser spot. 2PE is therefore ideal for high-resolution, deep-tissue, time-lapse imaging of dynamic processes in cell biology. Here, we provide examples of important applications of 2PE for in vivo imaging of neuronal structure and signals; we also describe how it can be combined with optogenetics or photolysis of caged molecules to simultaneously probe and control neuronal activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Engineering 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,779
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,862
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,266
of 260,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#97
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.