↓ Skip to main content

Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Sunlight, Ultraviolet Radiation, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Vitamin D and Cancer
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Vitamin D Status and Cancer Incidence and Ms
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Solar ultraviolet irradiance and cancer incidence and mortality.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The role of vitamin D for cardiovascular disease and overall mortality.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Epidemiology of skin cancer.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Histology of Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Cytogenetics of Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 The Immune System and Skin Cancer
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Human Papilloma Viruses and Skin Cancer
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Ultraviolet damage, DNA repair and vitamin D in nonmelanoma skin cancer and in malignant melanoma: an update.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Molecular Biology of Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinomas
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Solar Ultraviolet Radiation, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer Surveillance in Organ Transplant Recipients (OTRS)
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Therapy of Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Vitamin D Receptor
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Protection from Ultraviolet Damage and Photocarcinogenesis by Vitamin D Compounds
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Interaction of Hedgehog and Vitamin D Signaling Pathways in Basal Cell Carcinomas
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Solar ultraviolet exposure and mortality from skin tumors.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Ultraviolet radiation and cutaneous malignant melanoma.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Sun exposure and melanomas on sun-shielded and sun-exposed body areas.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Sunlight, vitamin D and malignant melanoma: an update.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Ultraviolet Exposure Scenarios
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Solar Ultraviolet Exposure and Mortality from Skin Tumors
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Sunscreens.
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Sunscreens in the United States
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Health Initiatives for the Prevention of Skin Cancer
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels for multiple health outcomes.
Attention for Chapter 25: Sunscreens.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Sunscreens.
Chapter number 25
Book title
Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0437-2_25
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0436-5, 978-1-4939-0437-2
Authors

Bens G, Guido Bens, Bens, Guido

Abstract

Sunscreens have become since more than 40 years the most popular means of protection against UV radiation (UVR) in Western countries. Organic and inorganic filters with different absorption spectrum exist. They filter or scatter UVR. Protection from UVB is quantified as a minimal erythema dose-based sun protection factor. UVA protection testing is less standardized: Persistent pigment darkening and critical wavelength are currently used methods. Marketing and labeling of sunscreens underlay national regulation which explains major differences between the European and the US sunscreen market. Sunscreens are most performing in sunburn prevention. Broad spectrum UVB and UVA protection and regular application in sufficient amounts are essential for prevention of skin cancers, UV-induced immunosuppression, and skin aging. A significant benefit from regular sunscreen use has not yet been demonstrated for primary prevention of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Concerning the prevention of actinic keratoses, squamous cell carcinomas, and skin aging, the effect of sunscreens is significant, but it remains incomplete. Some organic UV filters (PABA derivatives, cinnamates, benzophenones, and octocrylene) have been described to cause photoallergy. Percutaneous absorption and endocrine disrupting activity of small-sized organic and nano-sized inorganic UV filters have been reported. On lesional skin and in pediatric settings, these products should be used with caution. Cutaneous vitamin D synthesis depending on skin-carcinogenic UVB radiation, the potential risk of vitamin D deficiency by sunscreen use has become a major subject of public health debate. Sunscreens indeed impair vitamin D synthesis if they are used in the recommended amount of 2 mg/cm2, but not in lesser thickness below 1.5 mg/cm2 that corresponds better to what users apply in real life conditions. Large molecular last generation UVB-UVA broad spectrum sunscreens have a better benefit-risk ratio than former organic filters: They offer better protection in the UVA band, they are non toxic and non allergenic. A better outcome of sunscreen efficacy especially in primary skin cancer prevention may be achieved with these molecules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,873,138
of 24,394,175 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,258
of 5,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,097
of 243,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#11
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.