↓ Skip to main content

Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
910 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1103 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning
Published in
Higher Education, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
Authors

Jan H. F. Meyer, Ray Land

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 34 3%
Canada 11 <1%
United States 10 <1%
Australia 7 <1%
Sweden 7 <1%
South Africa 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Ireland 3 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 1008 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 224 20%
Lecturer 133 12%
Researcher 116 11%
Student > Master 97 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 74 7%
Other 314 28%
Unknown 145 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 330 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 109 10%
Arts and Humanities 62 6%
Computer Science 59 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 55 5%
Other 307 28%
Unknown 181 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,124,459
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#226
of 1,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,442
of 76,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them