You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (dSTORM)
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2080-8_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2079-2, 978-1-4939-2080-8
|
| Authors |
Ulrike Endesfelder, Mike Heilemann, Endesfelder, Ulrike, Heilemann, Mike |
| Editors |
Peter J. Verveer |
| Abstract |
Single-molecule localization-based super-resolution microscopy can be performed with regular, bright, and photostable organic fluorophores. We review a concept termed direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), which operates conventional fluorophores as photoswitches and provides an optical resolution of ~20 nm. We introduce the principle of dSTORM, illustrate experimental schemes, and discuss approaches for data analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 22% |
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 21 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,580,620
of 24,380,426 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,276
of 13,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,879
of 265,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#11
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,426 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.