↓ Skip to main content

Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Application of STED Microscopy to Cell Biology Questions.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Application of STED Microscopy to Cell Biology Questions.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2080-8_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2079-2, 978-1-4939-2080-8
Authors

Natalia H Revelo, Silvio O Rizzoli, Natalia H. Revelo, Silvio O. Rizzoli, Revelo, Natalia H., Rizzoli, Silvio O.

Editors

Peter J. Verveer

Abstract

The increasing interest in "seeing" the molecular environment in biological systems has led to the recent quest for breaking the diffraction barrier in far-field fluorescence microscopy. The first nanoscopy method successfully applied to conventional biological probes was stimulated emission depletion microscopy (STED). It is based on a physical principle that instantly delivers diffraction-unlimited images, with no need for further computational processing: the excitation laser beam is overlaid with a doughnut-shaped depleting beam that switches off previously excited fluorophores, thereby resulting in what is effectively a smaller imaging volume. In this chapter we give an overview of several applications of STED microscopy to biological questions. We explain technical aspects of sample preparation and image acquisition that will help in obtaining good diffraction-unlimited pictures. We also present embedding techniques adapted for ultrathin sectioning, which allow optimal 3D resolutions in virtually all biological preparations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 56%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 20%
Neuroscience 4 16%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,448,111
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,316
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,435
of 260,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#13
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.