Chapter title |
Stochastic anomaly detection in eye-tracking data for quantification of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 4 |
Book title |
Signal and Image Analysis for Biomedical and Life Sciences
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-10984-8_4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-910983-1, 978-3-31-910984-8
|
Authors |
Daniel Jansson, Alexander Medvedev, Hans Axelson, Dag Nyholm |
Editors |
Changming Sun, Tomasz Bednarz, Tuan D. Pham, Pascal Vallotton, Dadong Wang |
Abstract |
Two methods for distinguishing between healthy controls and patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease by means of recorded smooth pursuit eye movements are presented and evaluated. Both methods are based on the principles of stochastic anomaly detection and make use of orthogonal series approximation for probability distribution estimation. The first method relies on the identification of a Wiener model of the smooth pursuit system and attempts to find statistically significant differences between the estimated parameters in healthy controls and patients with Parkinson's disease. The second method applies the same statistical method to distinguish between the gaze trajectories of healthy and Parkinson subjects tracking visual stimuli. Both methods show promising results, where healthy controls and patients with Parkinson's disease are effectively separated in terms of the considered metric. The results are preliminary because of the small number of participating test subjects, but they are indicative of the potential of the presented methods as diagnosing or staging tools for Parkinson's disease. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Italy | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 6 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |