↓ Skip to main content

Computational Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Applications

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computational Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Applications'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Introduction to First-Principle Simulation of Molecular Systems
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Accurate Computations and Applications of Some Classes of Matrices
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Introduction to Communication Avoiding Algorithms for Direct Methods of Factorization in Linear Algebra
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Singular Traveling Waves and Non-linear Reaction-Diffusion Equations
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Numerical Simulation of Flows Involving Singularities
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Projection Hybrid Finite Volume-ADER/Finite Element Method for Turbulent Navier-Stokes
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Stable Discontinuous Galerkin Approximations for the Hydrostatic Stokes Equations
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 A Two-Step Model Identification for Stirred Tank Reactors: Incremental and Integral Methods
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Variance Reduction Result for a Projected Adaptive Biasing Force Method
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Modeling Chemical Kinetics in Solid State Reactions
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 ASSR Matrices and Some Particular Cases
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Computational Approach to Verbal Width in Alternating Groups
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Improvements in Resampling Techniques for Phenotype Prediction: Applications to Neurodegenerative Diseases
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 An Aortic Root Geometric Model, Based on Transesophageal Echocardiographic Image Sequences (TEE), for Biomechanical Simulation
Attention for Chapter 10: Variance Reduction Result for a Projected Adaptive Biasing Force Method
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Variance Reduction Result for a Projected Adaptive Biasing Force Method
Chapter number 10
Book title
Computational Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Applications
Published in
arXiv, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49631-3_10
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-949630-6, 978-3-31-949631-3
Authors

Houssam AlRachid, Tony Lelievre, Tony Lelièvre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#558,679
of 990,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,124
of 333,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#16,603
of 21,821 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21,821 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.