↓ Skip to main content

Human Cloning

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Cloning
Published by
Biomedical Ethics Reviews, August 1998
DOI 10.1007/978-1-59259-205-0
ISBNs
978-1-59259-205-0, 978-1-61737-076-2, 978-0-89603-565-2
Editors

James M. Humber, Robert Almeder

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,922,282
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Ethics Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,515
of 31,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Ethics Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them