↓ Skip to main content

Cell-Based Assays for High-Throughput Screening

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Whole-animal high-throughput screens: the C. elegans model.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Whole-animal high-throughput screens: the C. elegans model.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Cell-Based Assays for High-Throughput Screening
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-545-3_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60327-544-6, 978-1-60327-545-3
Authors

O'Rourke EJ, Conery AL, Moy TI, Eyleen J. O’Rourke, Annie L. Conery, Terence I. Moy, O’Rourke, Eyleen J., Conery, Annie L., Moy, Terence I.

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans shows a high degree of conservation of molecular pathways related to human disease, yet is only 1-mm long and can be considered as a microorganism. Because of the development of a simple but systematic RNA-interference (RNAi) methodology, C. elegans is the only metazoan in which the impact of "knocking-down" nearly every gene in the genome can be analyzed in a whole living animal. Both functional genomic studies and chemical screens can be carried out using C. elegans in vivo screens in a context that preserves intact cell-to-cell communication, neuroendocrine signaling, and every aspect of the animal's metabolism necessary to survive and reproduce in lab conditions. This feature enables studies that are impossible to undertake in cell-culture-based screens. Although genome-wide RNAi screens and limited small-molecule screens have been successfully performed in C. elegans, they are typically extremely labor-intensive. Furthermore, technical limitations have precluded quantitative measurements and time-resolved analyses.In this chapter, we provide detailed protocols to carry out automated high-throughput whole-animal RNAi and chemical screens. We describe methods to perform screens in solid and liquid media, in 96 and 384-well format, respectively. We describe the use of automated handling, sorting, and microscopy of worms. Finally, we give information about worm-adapted image analysis tools to quantify phenotypes. The technology presented here facilitates large-scale C. elegans genetic and chemical screens and it is expected to help shed light on relevant biological areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Researcher 9 19%
Professor 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Engineering 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,382,900
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,871
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,865
of 93,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#30
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.