↓ Skip to main content

T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Differentiation, Regulation and Function of Th9 Cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Differentiation, Regulation and Function of Th9 Cells.
Chapter number 7
Book title
T Helper Cell Differentiation and Their Function
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9487-9_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-179486-2, 978-9-40-179487-9
Authors

Jia L, Wu C, Lei Jia, Changyou Wu, Jia, Lei, Wu, Changyou

Abstract

Naïve CD4(+) T cells are activated and differentiate to distinct lineages of T helper (Th) cells, which are involved in physiological and pathological processes by obtaining the potential to produce different lineage-specific cytokines that mediate adaptive immunity. In the past decade, our knowledge of Th cells has been significantly expanded with the findings of new lineages. Interleukin (IL)-9 producing T cells are recently identified. In consideration of the ability to preferentially secret IL-9, these cells are termed Th9 cells. Given the multiple function of IL-9, Th9 cells participate in the lesion of many diseases, such as allergic inflammation, tumor, and parasitosis. In this chapter, we will focus on the cytokines, co-stimulatory factors, and transcriptional signaling pathways, which regulate Th9 cells development as well as stability, plasticity, and the multiple roles of Th9 cells in vivo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,175,751
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,135
of 5,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,375
of 254,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#8
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.