You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Manipulation of the Coronavirus Genome Using Targeted RNA Recombination with Interspecies Chimeric Coronaviruses
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 17 |
Book title |
SARS- and Other Coronaviruses
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-181-9_17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-58829-867-6, 978-1-59745-181-9
|
Authors |
Cornelis A.M. de Haan, Bert Jan Haijema, Paul S. Masters, Peter J.M. Rottier, de Haan, Cornelis A.M., Haijema, Bert Jan, Masters, Paul S., Rottier, Peter J.M. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 18% |
Australia | 4 | 5% |
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Argentina | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 52 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 79 | 90% |
Scientists | 5 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#622,790
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#39
of 14,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,497
of 169,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.