↓ Skip to main content

Spirochete Biology: The Post Genomic Era

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 49: Regulation of Gene and Protein Expression in the Lyme Disease Spirochete
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Regulation of Gene and Protein Expression in the Lyme Disease Spirochete
Chapter number 49
Book title
Spirochete Biology: The Post Genomic Era
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/82_2017_49
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-989637-3, 978-3-31-989638-0
Authors

Brian Stevenson, Janakiram Seshu

Abstract

The infectious cycle of Borrelia burgdorferi necessitates persistent infection of both vertebrates and ticks, and efficient means of transmission between those two very different types of hosts. The Lyme disease spirochete has evolved mechanisms to sense its location in the infectious cycle, and use that information to control production of the proteins and other factors required for each step. Numerous components of borrelial regulatory pathways have been characterized to date. Their effects are being pieced together, thereby providing glimpses into a complex web of cooperative and antagonistic interactions. In this chapter, we present a broad overview of B. burgdorferi gene and protein regulation during the natural infectious cycle, discussions of culture-based methods for elucidating regulatory mechanisms, and summaries of many of the known regulatory proteins and small molecules. We also highlight areas that are in need of substantially more research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 12 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,482,347
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#447
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,334
of 421,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#27
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.