You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Quantitative Trait Loci for Root Growth Response to Cadaverine in Arabidopsis
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 22 |
| Book title |
Polyamines
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7398-9_22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7397-2, 978-1-4939-7398-9
|
| Authors |
Nicole M. Gibbs, Laura Vaughn Rouhana, Patrick H. Masson |
| Abstract |
Root growth architecture is a major determinant of agricultural productivity and plant fitness in natural ecosystems. Here we describe the methods used in a Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) study that allowed the identification of ORGANIC CATION TRANSPORTER 1 (OCT1) as a determinant of root growth response to cadaverine treatment in Arabidopsis thaliana. This protocol screens natural accessions to characterize the variation in root growth response to the naturally occurring polyamine cadaverine, then uses recombination mapping to identify loci that are responsible for the variation existing between two accessions with contrasting phenotypes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,482,347
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,388
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,687
of 442,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#596
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.