↓ Skip to main content

Targeting Trafficking in Drug Development

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Targeting Trafficking in Drug Development'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 49 Intracellular Trafficking of Gonadotropin Receptors in Health and Disease
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 50 Pharmacological Chaperones as Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Misfolded Mutant Vasopressin Receptors
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 55 Natural (and Unnatural) Small Molecules as Pharmacological Chaperones and Inhibitors in Cancer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 57 Investigating Internalization and Intracellular Trafficking of GPCRs: New Techniques and Real-Time Experimental Approaches
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 59 Folding Defects Leading to Primary Hyperoxaluria
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 60 Targeting of Disordered Proteins by Small Molecules in Neurodegenerative Diseases
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 62 The Molecular Physiopathogenesis of Islet Amyloidosis
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 64 Pharmacoperones for Misfolded Gonadotropin Receptors
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 65 Conserved Oligomeric Golgi and Neuronal Vesicular Trafficking
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 67 Heritable Skeletal Disorders Arising from Defects in Processing and Transport of Type I Procollagen from the ER: Perspectives on Possible Therapeutic Approaches
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 68 Pharmacological Chaperones: Beyond Conformational Disorders
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 71 SLC6 Transporter Folding Diseases and Pharmacochaperoning
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 72 Potential Pharmacological Chaperones for Cystathionine Beta-Synthase-Deficient Homocystinuria
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 103 Cystic Fibrosis, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator and Drugs: Insights from Cellular Trafficking
Attention for Chapter 68: Pharmacological Chaperones: Beyond Conformational Disorders
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pharmacological Chaperones: Beyond Conformational Disorders
Chapter number 68
Book title
Targeting Trafficking in Drug Development
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/164_2017_68
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-974163-5, 978-3-31-974164-2
Authors

Nancy J. Leidenheimer, Leidenheimer, Nancy J.

Abstract

Pharmacological chaperones (PCs) are small molecules that bind to nascent protein targets to facilitate their biogenesis. The ability of PCs to assist in the folding and subsequent forward trafficking of disease-causative protein misfolding mutants has opened new avenues for the treatment of conformational diseases such as cystic fibrosis and lysosomal storage disorders. In this chapter, an overview of the use of PCs for the treatment of conformational disorders is provided. Beyond the therapeutic application of PCs for the treatment of these disorders, pharmacological chaperoning of wild-type integral membrane proteins is discussed. Central to this discussion is the notion that the endoplasmic reticulum is a reservoir of viable but inefficiently processed wild-type protein folding intermediates whose biogenesis can be facilitated by PCs to increase functional pools. To date, the potential therapeutic use of PCs to enhance the biogenesis of wild-type proteins has received little attention. Here the rationale for the development of PCs that target WT proteins is discussed. Also considered is the likelihood that some commonly used therapeutic agents may exert unrecognized pharmacological chaperoning activity on wild-type targets in patient populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Chemistry 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#399
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,334
of 421,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.