↓ Skip to main content

Lung Cancer and Autoimmune Disorders

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 18: Fatigue in Sarcoidosis and Exercise Tolerance, Dyspnea, and Quality of Life.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Fatigue in Sarcoidosis and Exercise Tolerance, Dyspnea, and Quality of Life.
Chapter number 18
Book title
Lung Cancer and Autoimmune Disorders
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/5584_2014_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-909751-0, 978-3-31-909752-7
Authors

Jastrzębski D, Ziora D, Lubecki M, Zieleźnik K, Maksymiak M, Hanzel J, Początek A, Kolczyńska A, Nguyen Thi L, Zebrowska A, Kozielski J, D. Jastrzębski, D. Ziora, M. Lubecki, K. Zieleźnik, M. Maksymiak, J. Hanzel, A. Początek, A. Kolczyńska, L. Nguyen Thi, A. Żebrowska, J. Kozielski, Jastrzębski, D., Ziora, D., Lubecki, M., Zieleźnik, K., Maksymiak, M., Hanzel, J., Początek, A., Kolczyńska, A., Nguyen Thi, L., Żebrowska, A., Kozielski, J.

Abstract

Fatigue is one of the major symptoms reported by sarcoidosis patients. The relationship between fatigue and clinical course of sarcoidosis remains unclear. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between fatigue and lung function tests, exercise tolerance, dyspnea, and quality of life among sarcoidosis patients. One hundred eleven sarcoidosis patients completed the following questionnaires: Fatigue and Assessment Scale (FAS), Quality of Life Scale (SF-36), and dyspnea scales: Medical Research Council Questionnaire, Baseline Dyspnea Index, and Oxygen Cost Diagram. Clinical parameters (FVC, FEV1, DLCO, VO2, and VO2/AT, and work load) were derived from the patients' medical files. The exercise tolerance was the only clinical parameter associated with fatigue (Max. Work Load -0.65, VO2 -0.42, VO2/AT -0.51). No correlations were found between FAS and spirometry or diffusing tolerance. Fatigue correlated with all dyspnea domains by means of (r values ranging from 0.47 to 0.77 in multivariate regression analysis) and with quality of life in SF-36 questionnaire (r values ranging from -0.33 to -0.83). We conclude that FAS seems a reliable and valid indicator of dyspnea level, quality of life, and exercise tolerance in sarcoidosis patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 17%
Psychology 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,202,176
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,092
of 4,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,059
of 255,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#21
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.