You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Detection of β-Galactosidase Activity: X-gal Staining.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Kidney Development
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-851-1_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-850-4, 978-1-61779-851-1
|
Authors |
Burn SF, Sally F. Burn, Burn, Sally F. |
Abstract |
X-gal staining is a rapid and convenient histochemical technique used to detect reporter gene expression. A prerequisite is the creation or acquisition of transgenic reporter mouse lines, in which the bacterial LacZ gene has been knocked into the gene of interest or placed under the control of regulatory elements corresponding to the gene of interest. Expression is marked by a dark blue stain and can be detected at the single cell level, providing a robust visual readout of gene expression in the developing kidney. Here, we describe the methodology, applications, and limitations of this technique. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 210 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 82 | 39% |
Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
Researcher | 8 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 5% |
Unknown | 69 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Unknown | 75 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,238,443
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,866
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,243
of 165,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#38
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.