↓ Skip to main content

NMDA Receptors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'NMDA Receptors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 NMDA Receptors in the Central Nervous System
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Quantification of NMDAR Subunit Genes Expression by qRT-PCR
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Genetic and Functional Analysis of GRIN2A in Tumor Samples
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Detection of NMDARs Antibodies in Encephalitis
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Magnetofection™ of NMDA Receptor Subunits GluN1 and GluN2A Expression Vectors in Non-Neuronal Host Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Transfection in Primary Cultured Neuronal Cells
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Selective Cell-Surface Expression of Triheteromeric NMDA Receptors
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Functional Analysis of Recombinant Channels in Host Cells Using a Fast Agonist Application System
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 GluN2B Subunit Labeling with Fluorescent Probes and High-Resolution Live Imaging
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Design of Light-Sensitive NMDARs by Genetically Encoded Photo-Cross-Linkers
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Gene Targeted Mice with Conditional Knock-In (-Out) of NMDAR Mutations
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Electrophysiological Investigation of NMDA Current Properties in Brain Slices
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Analysis of Functional NMDA Receptors in Astrocytes
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 GluNs Detection and Functions in Microglial Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 NMDA Receptor Activity in Circulating Red Blood Cells: Methods of Detection
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 NMDA Receptors as Voltage Sensors
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Development of a Computational Approach/Model to Explore NMDA Receptors Functions
Attention for Chapter 15: NMDA Receptor Activity in Circulating Red Blood Cells: Methods of Detection
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
NMDA Receptor Activity in Circulating Red Blood Cells: Methods of Detection
Chapter number 15
Book title
NMDA Receptors
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7321-7_15
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7320-0, 978-1-4939-7321-7
Authors

Asya Makhro, Lars Kaestner, Anna Bogdanova, Makhro, Asya, Kaestner, Lars, Bogdanova, Anna

Abstract

Abundance and activity of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) in circulating red blood cells contributes to the maintenance of intracellular Ca(2+) in these cells and, by doing that, controls red cell volume, membrane stability, and O2 carrying capacity. Detection of the NMDA receptor activity in red blood cells is challenging as the number of its copies is low and shows substantial cell-to-cell heterogeneity. Receptor abundance is reliably assessed using the radiolabeled antagonist ([(3)H]MK-801) binding technique. Uptake of Ca(2+) following the NMDA receptor activation is detected in cells loaded with Ca(2+)-sensitive fluorescent dye Fluo-4 AM. Both microfluorescence live-cell imaging and flow cytometry may be used for fluorescence intensity detection. Automated patch clamp is currently used for recording of electric currents triggered by the stimulation of the NMDA receptor. These currents are mediated by the Ca(2+)-sensitive K(+) (Gardos) channels that open upon Ca(2+) uptake via the active NMDA receptor. Furthermore, K(+) flux through the Gardos channels induced by the NMDA receptor stimulation in red blood cells may be detected using unidirectional K(+)((86)Rb(+)) influx.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,540,801
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,341
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,628
of 421,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#246
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.