You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Enumeration of Bacteriophages by the Direct Plating Plaque Assay
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Bacteriophages
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60327-164-6_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-58829-682-5, 978-1-60327-164-6
|
| Authors |
Amanda Mazzocco, Thomas E. Waddell, Erika Lingohr, Roger P. Johnson, Mazzocco, Amanda, Waddell, Thomas E., Lingohr, Erika, Johnson, Roger P. |
| Editors |
Martha R.J. Clokie, Andrew M. Kropinski |
| Abstract |
A method is described for determination of the concentration of infectious phage particles by the direct plating plaque assay, which is simpler and faster than the double agar overlay plaque procedure outlined in the previous chapter. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 37% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,865
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,317
of 169,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#151
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.