↓ Skip to main content

GeNeDis 2016

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'GeNeDis 2016'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Preclinical Validation of the Located Hyperthermia Using Gold Macro-Rods and Ultrasound as an Effective Treatment for Solid Tumors
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Cerebral Thrombosis: A Neurogenetic Approach
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Correlations Between Nutrition Habits, Anxiety and Metabolic Parameters in Greek Healthy Adults
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Neuronal Correlation Parameter and the Idea of Thermodynamic Entropy of an N-Body Gravitationally Bounded System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Determination of Soft Tissue Breakpoint Based on Its Temperature Enhancement Pattern: In Vivo and In Vitro Experiments
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Huntington Disease: Genetics, Prevention, and Therapy Approaches
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Paris System-Based Implant Approach to Hyperthermia Cancer Tumor with Gold Seeds and Ultrasound
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Clinical, Social and Demographics Factors Associated with Spiritual Wellbeing in End Stage Renal Disease
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Cognitive Enhancement for Elderly Facing Dementia with the Use of Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy Techniques and Psychological Treatment. A Case Study
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Biobibliometrics (UGDH-TP53–BRCA1) Genes Connections in the Possible Relationship Between Breast Cancer and EEG
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Diagnostic Evaluation of Huntington’s Disease Within the Frame of Bioinformatics
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Gold Rods Irradiated with Ultrasound for Combination of Hyperthermia and Cancer Chemotherapy
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Assessment of Depression in Elderly. Is Perceived Social Support Related? A Nursing Home Study
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Neurofibromatosis-Noonan Syndrome: A Possible Paradigm of the Combination of Genetic and Epigenetic Factors
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Clinical Simulation Training in Geriatric Medicine: A Review of the Evidence and Lessons for Training in Psychiatry of Old Age
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Integrating Omic Technologies in Alzheimer’s Disease
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Anxiety and Depression in Staff of Mental Units: The Role of Burnout
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Scheduling and Modeling a Cognitive Assessment Guide for Screening AD by Primary Care Physicians
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Quality of Life
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Molecular Chaperones in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Short Review
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Interactome of Obesity: Obesidome
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Fatigue in Arthritis: A Multidimensional Phenomenon with Impact on Quality of Life
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Association of Nutrients with Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Searching for Correlations Between the Development of Neurodegenerative Hallmarks: Targeting Huntingtin as a Contributing Factor
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 The Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Working Memory
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Bioimpedance Measurements in Adolescents with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Pilot Study
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Post-Operative Delirium in Elderly People Diagnostic and Management Issues of Post-Operative Delirium in Elderly People
Attention for Chapter 19: Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Quality of Life
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Quality of Life
Chapter number 19
Book title
GeNeDis 2016
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57379-3_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-957378-6, 978-3-31-957379-3
Authors

Maria Tsekoura, Alexandros Kastrinis, Marianna Katsoulaki, Evdokia Billis, John Gliatis, Tsekoura, Maria, Kastrinis, Alexandros, Katsoulaki, Marianna, Billis, Evdokia, Gliatis, John

Abstract

Sarcopenia is recognized as a major health problem among older adults. This syndrome is associated with serious health consequences in terms of frailty, disability, morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to review sarcopenia and its impact on quality of life (QoL). MEDLINE database was searched from January to March 2016 using predefined search terms "sarcopenia", quality of life". Based on extensive literature search, 32 articles were identified while only 6 studies met the inclusion criteria and were associated with sarcopenia and QoL. Quality of life level was measured using generic self-reported tools; the Medical Outcomes Survey Short-form General Health Survey (SF-36) in 4 studies and EuroQol-5D instrument (EQ-5D) in 2 studies. Subjects with sarcopenia demonstrated a significantly high proportion of problems relating to several dimensions of QoL. More studies based on Sarcopenia and QoL are needed. Although the impact of sarcopenia on QoL was assessed in all studies with QoL generic instruments, it would be more insightful to utilise a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire, such as the SarQoL for sarcopenic subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 86 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Sports and Recreations 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 105 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,268
of 5,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,855
of 423,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#121
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.