You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expanding the genetic heterogeneity of intellectual disability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00439-017-1843-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shams Anazi, Sateesh Maddirevula, Vincenzo Salpietro, Yasmine T. Asi, Saud Alsahli, Amal Alhashem, Hanan E. Shamseldin, Fatema AlZahrani, Nisha Patel, Niema Ibrahim, Firdous M. Abdulwahab, Mais Hashem, Nadia Alhashmi, Fathiya Al Murshedi, Adila Al Kindy, Ahmad Alshaer, Ahmed Rumayyan, Saeed Al Tala, Wesam Kurdi, Abdulaziz Alsaman, Ali Alasmari, Selina Banu, Tipu Sultan, Mohammed M. Saleh, Hisham Alkuraya, Mustafa A. Salih, Hesham Aldhalaan, Tawfeg Ben-Omran, Fatima Al Musafri, Rehab Ali, Jehan Suleiman, Brahim Tabarki, Ayman W. El-Hattab, Caleb Bupp, Majid Alfadhel, Nada Al Tassan, Dorota Monies, Stefan T. Arold, Mohamed Abouelhoda, Tammaryn Lashley, Henry Houlden, Eissa Faqeih, Fowzan S. Alkuraya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 20 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 71% |
| Scientists | 13 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,030,650
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#75
of 2,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,700
of 327,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.