↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Genetic Toxicology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Application of Structure–Activity Relationships to the Prediction of the Mutagenic Activity of Chemicals
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Bacterial Mutagenicity Assays: Test Methods
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Mouse Lymphoma Assay
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Mammalian Cell HPRT Gene Mutation Assay: Test Methods
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Interpretation and Analysis of Cytogenetic Data
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 The In Vitro and In Vivo Comet Assays
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Assessment of DNA Interstrand Crosslinks Using the Modified Alkaline Comet Assay
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 (32)P-postlabelling for the Sensitive Detection of DNA Adducts.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Methods for the Detection of DNA Adducts
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 The GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC Assay.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction: Technical Considerations for Gene Expression Analysis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Cytogenetic In Vivo Assays in Somatic Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Cytogenetic Methods in Human Biomonitoring: Principles and Uses
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Measurement of Induced Genetic Change in Mammalian Germ Cells
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Transgenic Animal Mutation Models: A Review of the Models and How They Function
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Analysis of Genotoxicity Data in a Regulatory Context
Attention for Chapter 10: (32)P-postlabelling for the Sensitive Detection of DNA Adducts.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
(32)P-postlabelling for the Sensitive Detection of DNA Adducts.
Chapter number 10
Book title
Genetic Toxicology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-420-9, 978-1-61779-421-6
Authors

Jones NJ, Nigel J. Jones, Jones, Nigel J.

Abstract

32P-postlabelling is a technique originally described by Kurt Randerath and colleagues for the sensitive detection of damage produced in DNA by reactive chemicals or genotoxins. The procedure essentially entails the enzymatic digestion of DNA to nucleoside 3'-monophosphates which are then radioactively labelled using T4 polynucleotide kinase and [γ(32)P]-adenosine triphosphate. Adducted nucleoside-3'-5'-bisphosphates are then separated from their normal counterparts by thin layer chromatography. Prior to the development of the assay, quantification of DNA adducts was confined to studies that utilised compounds synthesised to be isotopically labelled with tritium or carbon-14. As such, these studies were limited to specific and recognised genotoxins that could be administered only in the laboratory to cultures or animals. With (32)P-postlabelling it was possible not only to determine DNA adduct induction by a relatively uncharacterised suspected carcinogen, but also following exposure to complex mixtures containing a multitude of known and unknown potential genotoxins. The small amount of DNA required to perform the (32)P-postlabelling assay also meant that human biomonitoring studies using readily obtainable tissues, such as lymphocytes, were possible. Using the standard (32)P-postlabelling method, it is possible to detect a single DNA adduct in 10(7) to 10(8) normal nucleotides. The subsequent development of several enhancement methods improved this detection rate to one adduct in 10(10) nucleotides. For these reasons, the (32)-postlabelling assay represents an extremely versatile and extremely sensitive method to detect and monitor DNA damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,896
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,318
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,979
of 241,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#257
of 463 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 463 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.