↓ Skip to main content

Do Corresponding Authors Take Responsibility for Their Work? A Covert Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Corresponding Authors Take Responsibility for Their Work? A Covert Survey
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3868-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teun Teunis, Sjoerd P. F. T. Nota, Joseph H. Schwab

Abstract

Publication of a manuscript does not end an author's responsibilities. Reasons to contact an author after publication include clarification, access to raw data, and collaboration. However, legitimate questions have been raised regarding whether these responsibilities generally are being met by corresponding authors of biomedical publications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,231,939
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#133
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,131
of 243,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#3
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.