↓ Skip to main content

Community Readiness for Change and Youth Violence Prevention: a Tale of Two Cities

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community Readiness for Change and Youth Violence Prevention: a Tale of Two Cities
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10464-010-9415-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Nash Parker, Roxanna Alcaraz, Pedro R. Payne

Abstract

This case study identifies a situation in which there exists a set of preconditions for the successful application of evidence based practice to bear on the community based problem of youth violence. The concept of readiness to change and its impact on the success or failure of interventions designed to change harmful or dangerous behavior among individuals is well established and understood in intervention research. In recent years this concept has been discussed and developed in the community intervention and harm reduction literatures. The current study is one of a community where an attempt was made to identify community levels of harm, develop a strategic plan to reduce the source of harm, and develop, implement, and evaluate youth violence prevention interventions. Over more than 5 years of involvement by university based researchers and community partners, the effort was largely unsuccessful. The events of this project are discussed within the context of the Community Readiness Model Edwards et al. (J Community Psychol 28(3): 291-307, 2000) and we present a narrative that helps to highlight the reasons for the relative lack of success of the effort. We suggest additional strategies and actions that might have helped to overcome the lack of readiness of this particular community to reduce the harms associated with youth violence. Suggestions that may improve chances for a more successful set of outcomes for other communities in similar states of readiness to change and with similar challenges are given.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 64 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 29%
Psychology 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,165,692
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#219
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,424
of 180,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.