You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Recognizing Buildings Using a Mobile System and a Reference City Model
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 16 |
Book title |
Digital Cities III. Information Technologies for Social Capital: Cross-cultural Perspectives
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2003
|
DOI | 10.1007/11407546_16 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-025331-0, 978-3-54-025971-8
|
Authors |
Wanji Mai, Chris Tweed, Gordon Dodds, Mai, Wanji, Tweed, Chris, Dodds, Gordon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,201,003
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,402
of 8,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,158
of 51,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.