You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Dynamic Neural Fuzzy Inference System
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 151 |
| Book title |
Advances in Neuro-Information Processing
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-02490-0_151 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-202489-4, 978-3-64-202490-0
|
| Authors |
Yuan-Chun Hwang, Qun Song, Mario Köppen, Nikola Kasabov, George Coghill, Hwang, Yuan-Chun, Song, Qun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,233,547
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,982
of 8,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,311
of 169,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#149
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.