↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic Options for Acute Cough Due to Upper Respiratory Infections in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 902)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic Options for Acute Cough Due to Upper Respiratory Infections in Children
Published in
Lung, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00408-011-9319-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian M. Paul

Abstract

Cough due to upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) is one of the most frequent complaints encountered by pediatric health-care providers, and one of the most disruptive symptoms for children and families. Despite the frequency of URIs, there is limited evidence to support the few therapeutic agents currently available in the United States (US) to treat acute cough due to URI. Published, well-designed, contemporary research supporting the efficacy of narcotics (codeine, hydrocodone) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved over-the-counter (OTC) oral antitussives and expectorants (dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, chlophedianol, and guaifenesin) is absent for URI-associated pediatric cough. Alternatively, honey and topically applied vapor rubs may be effective antitussives.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 407. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#62,623
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#3
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181
of 126,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them