↓ Skip to main content

Capsaicin as a Therapeutic Molecule

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Capsaicin-based therapies for pain control.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Capsaicin-based therapies for pain control.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Capsaicin as a Therapeutic Molecule
Published in
Fortschritte der Arzneimittelforschung Progress in drug research Progrès des recherches pharmaceutiques, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-0828-6_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-480827-9, 978-3-03-480828-6
Authors

Smith H, Brooks JR, Howard Smith, John R. Brooks, Smith, Howard, Brooks, John R.

Abstract

The TRPV1 receptor is known to play a role in nociceptive transmission in multiple organ systems, usually in response to the pain of inflammation. TRPV1 antagonism has so far shown limited benefit in antinociception. Capsaicin, a TRPV1 agonist, has been shown to induce a refractory period in the nerve terminal expressing TRPV1 and even, in sufficient dosing, to create long-term nerve terminal defunctionalization. This has led to research into topical capsaicin as a treatment for multiple painful conditions. The majority of work has focused on musculoskeletal pain and neuropathic pain and has revealed that although low-dose topical capsaicin has limited effectiveness as an analgesic, high-dose capsaicin, when tolerated, has the potential for long-term analgesia in certain types of neuropathic pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,385
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Fortschritte der Arzneimittelforschung Progress in drug research Progrès des recherches pharmaceutiques
#19
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,866
of 228,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fortschritte der Arzneimittelforschung Progress in drug research Progrès des recherches pharmaceutiques
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.