↓ Skip to main content

Histone Deacetylases: the Biology and Clinical Implication

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: The role of Mammalian sirtuins in the regulation of metabolism, aging, and longevity.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The role of Mammalian sirtuins in the regulation of metabolism, aging, and longevity.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Histone Deacetylases: the Biology and Clinical Implication
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21631-2_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-221630-5, 978-3-64-221631-2
Authors

Akiko Satoh, Liana Stein, Shin Imai, Satoh, Akiko, Stein, Liana, Imai, Shin

Abstract

Ever since the discovery of sirtuins a decade ago, interest in this family of NAD-dependent deacetylases has exploded, generating multiple lines of evidence implicating sirtuins as evolutionarily conserved regulators of lifespan. In mammals, it has been established that sirtuins regulate physiological responses to metabolism and stress, two key factors that affect the process of aging. Further investigation into the intimate connection among sirtuins, metabolism, and aging has implicated the activation of SIRT1 as both preventative and therapeutic measures against multiple age-associated disorders including type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. SIRT1 activation has clear potential to not only prevent age-associated diseases but also to extend healthspan and perhaps lifespan. Sirtuin activating compounds and NAD intermediates are two promising ways to achieve these elusive goals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,717,650
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#372
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,537
of 180,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.