Chapter title |
What Will Be the Benefits of Biotech Wheat for European Agriculture?
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 2 |
Book title |
Wheat Biotechnology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7337-8_2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7335-4, 978-1-4939-7337-8
|
Authors |
Agnès E. Ricroch |
Abstract |
In European countries, wheat occupies the largest crop area with high yielding production. France, a major producer and exporter in Europe, ranks the fifth producer worldwide. Biotic stresses are European farmers' major challenges (fungal and viral diseases, and insect pests) followed by abiotic ones such as drought and grain protein composition. During the last 40 years, 1136 scientific articles on biotech wheat were published by USA followed by China, Australia, Canada, and European Union with the UK. European research focuses on pests and diseases resistances using widely marker-assisted selection (MAS). Transgenesis is used in basic research to develop resistance against some fungi (Fusarium head blight) while RNA interference (RNAi) silencing is used against some fungi and virus. Transgenic plants were also transformed with genes from various species for drought tolerance. The UK (mostly with transgenesis and site-specific nucleases) and France (with no transgenic tools but with MAS and site-specific nucleases) are the main countries carrying out research programs for both biotic stress and drought tolerance. Thus, few European countries used transgenesis for gluten protein composition and RNAi-mediated silencing in celiac disease. Because of vandalism field trials of transgenics dropped since 2000. No transgenic wheat is cultivated in Europe for political reasons. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 35% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |