↓ Skip to main content

Wheat Biotechnology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Wheat Biotechnology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Enabling Molecular Technologies for Trait Improvement in Wheat
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 What Will Be the Benefits of Biotech Wheat for European Agriculture?
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Overview of the Wheat Genetic Transformation and Breeding Status in China
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Wheat Improvement in India: Present and Future
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Overview of Methods for Assessing Salinity and Drought Tolerance of Transgenic Wheat Lines
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Allergenicity Assessment of Transgenic Wheat Lines In Silico
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Agribusiness Perspectives on Transgenic Wheat
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Wheat Using Immature Embryos
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Biolistic Transformation of Wheat
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Wheat Genetic Transformation Using Mature Embryos as Explants
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Targeted Mutagenesis in Hexaploid Bread Wheat Using the TALEN and CRISPR/Cas Systems
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Design and Assembly of CRISPR/Cas9 Reagents for Gene Knockout, Targeted Insertion, and Replacement in Wheat
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Doubled Haploid Transgenic Wheat Lines by Microspore Transformation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Doubled Haploid Laboratory Protocol for Wheat Using Wheat–Maize Wide Hybridization
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Real-Time PCR for the Detection of Precise Transgene Copy Number in Wheat
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Endogenous Reference Genes and Their Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays for Genetically Modified Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Detection
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Phenotypic Characterization of Transgenic Wheat Lines Against Fungal Pathogens Puccinia triticina and Fusarium graminearum
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Databases for Wheat Genomics and Crop Improvement
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 High-Density SNP Genotyping Array for Hexaploid Wheat and Its Relatives
Attention for Chapter 11: Targeted Mutagenesis in Hexaploid Bread Wheat Using the TALEN and CRISPR/Cas Systems
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Targeted Mutagenesis in Hexaploid Bread Wheat Using the TALEN and CRISPR/Cas Systems
Chapter number 11
Book title
Wheat Biotechnology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7337-8_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7335-4, 978-1-4939-7337-8
Authors

Yanpeng Wang, Yuan Zong, Caixia Gao

Abstract

The use of sequence-specific transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-associated system (CRISPR/Cas9) have provided powerful reverse genetic approaches to the targeted modification of genomes in numerous organisms. Both systems have been employed to generate loss-of-function alleles in bread wheat, by targeting multiple and single copies of genes. Here we present protocols for modifying the wheat genome using the two systems. The protocols include the design of TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9 target sites and their construction, evaluation of their activities in protoplasts, transformation of plants, and mutation screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 54%
Engineering 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,081,725
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,962
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,430
of 421,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#346
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.