↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 228

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Adverse effects of bisphenol a on male reproductive function.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Adverse effects of bisphenol a on male reproductive function.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 228
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-01619-1_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-901618-4, 978-3-31-901619-1
Authors

Manfo FP, Jubendradass R, Nantia EA, Moundipa PF, Mathur PP, Faustin Pascal Tsagué Manfo, Rajamanickam Jubendradass, Edouard Akono Nantia, Paul Fewou Moundipa, Premendu Prakash Mathur, Manfo, Faustin Pascal Tsagué, Jubendradass, Rajamanickam, Nantia, Edouard Akono, Moundipa, Paul Fewou, Mathur, Premendu Prakash

Abstract

BPA is a ubiquitous environmental contaminant, resulting mainly from manufacturing,use or disposal of plastics of which it is a component, and the degradation of industrial plastic-related wastes. Growing evidence from research on laboratory animals, wildlife, and humans supports the view that BPA produces an endocrine disrupting effect and adversely affects male reproductive function. To better understand the adverse effects caused by exposure to BPA, we performed an up-to-date literature review on the topic, with particular emphasis on in utero exposure, and associated effects on spermatogenesis, steroidogenesis, and accessory organs.BPA studies on experimental animals show that effects are generally more detrimental during in utero exposure, a critical developmental stage for the embryo. BPA has been found to produce several defects in the embryo, such as feminization of male fetuses, atrophy of the testes and epididymides, increased prostate size, shortening of AGD, disruption of BTB, and alteration of adult sperm parameters (e.g.,sperm count, motility, and density). BPA also affects embryo thyroid development.During the postnatal and pubertal periods and adulthood, BPA affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis by modulating hormone (e.g., LH and FSH,androgen and estrogen) synthesis, expression and function of respective receptors(ER, AR). These effects alter sperm parameters. BPA also induces oxidative stress in the testis and epididymis, by inhibiting antioxidant enzymes and stimulating lipid peroxidation. This suggests that employing antioxidants may be a promising strategy to relieve BPA-induced disturbances.Epidemiological studies have also provided data indicating that BPA alters male reproductive function in humans. These investigations revealed that men occupationally exposed to BPA had high blood/urinary BPA levels, and abnormal semen parameters. BPA-exposed men also showed reduced libido and erectile ejaculatory difficulties; moreover, the overall BPA effects on male reproduction appear to be more harmful if exposure occurs in utero. The regulation of BPA and BPA-related products should be reinforced, particularly where exposure during the fetal period can occur. The current TDI for BPA is proposed as 25 and 50 1-1g/kg bwt/day (European Food Safety Authority and Health Canada, respectively). Based on the evidence available, we believe that a TDI value of 5 1-1g/kg bwt/day is more appropriate (the endpoint is modulation of rat testicular function). Certain BPA derivatives are being considered as alternatives to BPA. However, certain of these related products display adverse effects that are similar to those of BPA. These effects should be carefully considered before using them as final alternatives to BPA in plastic production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Environmental Science 13 9%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,029,861
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#28
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,478
of 225,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them