↓ Skip to main content

Periconception in Physiology and Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: The Role of Maternal Nutrition During the Periconceptional Period and Its Effect on Offspring Phenotype
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Role of Maternal Nutrition During the Periconceptional Period and Its Effect on Offspring Phenotype
Chapter number 5
Book title
Periconception in Physiology and Medicine
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62414-3_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-962412-9, 978-3-31-962414-3
Authors

Tom P. Fleming, Judith J. Eckert, Oleg Denisenko

Abstract

The early preimplantation embryo has been rigorously studied for decades to understand inherent reproductive and developmental mechanisms driving its morphogenesis from before fertilisation through to and beyond implantation. Recent research has demonstrated that this short developmental window is also critical for the embryo's interaction with external, maternal factors, particularly nutritional status. Here, maternal dietary quality has been shown to alter the pattern of development in an enduring way that can influence health throughout the lifetime. Thus, using mouse models, maternal protein restriction exclusively during the preimplantation period with normal nutrition thereafter is sufficient to cause adverse cardiometabolic and neurological outcomes in adult offspring. Evidence for similar effects whereby environmental factors during the periconceptional window can programme postnatal disease risk can be found in human and large animal models and also in response to in vitro conditions such as assisted conception and related infertility treatments. In this review, using mouse malnutrition models, we evaluate the step-by-step mechanisms that lead from maternal poor diet consumption though to offspring disease. We consider how adverse programming within the embryo may be induced, what nutrient factors and signalling pathways may be involved, and how these cues act to change the embryo in distinct ways across placental and foetal lineage paths, leading especially to changes in the growth trajectory which in turn associate with later disease risk. These mechanisms straddle epigenetic, molecular, cellular and physiological levels of biology and suggest, for health outcomes, preimplantation development to be the most important time in our lives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Researcher 7 11%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,571,001
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,325
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,387
of 421,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#333
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.