You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Bioinformatics for Analysis of Poxvirus Genomes
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Vaccinia Virus and Poxvirology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-876-4_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-875-7, 978-1-61779-876-4
|
| Authors |
Melissa Da Silva, Chris Upton, Silva, Melissa, Upton, Chris, Silva, Melissa Da |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 63% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,538,395
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,338
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,345
of 245,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#139
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.