You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bits and bytes: the future of radiology lies in informatics and information technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-016-4688-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James A. Brink, Ronald L. Arenson, Thomas M. Grist, Jonathan S. Lewin, Dieter Enzmann |
| Abstract |
Advances in informatics and information technology are sure to alter the practice of medical imaging and image-guided therapies substantially over the next decade. Each element of the imaging continuum will be affected by substantial increases in computing capacity coincident with the seamless integration of digital technology into our society at large. This article focuses primarily on areas where this IT transformation is likely to have a profound effect on the practice of radiology. • Clinical decision support ensures consistent and appropriate resource utilization. • Big data enables correlation of health information across multiple domains. • Data mining advances the quality of medical decision-making. • Business analytics allow radiologists to maximize the benefits of imaging resources. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 40% |
| Austria | 2 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 25% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,242,049
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#324
of 4,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,760
of 313,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,828 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.