You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Statistical analysis of quantitative RT-PCR results.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
Drug Safety Evaluation
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-849-2_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-60327-186-8, 978-1-60761-849-2
|
| Authors |
Khan-Malek R, Wang Y, Richard Khan-Malek, Ying Wang, Khan-Malek, Richard, Wang, Ying |
| Abstract |
Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) represents a benchmark technology in the detection and quantification of mRNA. Yet, accurate results cannot be realized without proper statistical analysis of RT-PCR data. Here, we examine some of the issues concerning RT-PCR experiments that would benefit from rigorous statistical treatment, including normalization, quantification, efficiency estimation, and sample size calculations. Examples are used to illustrate the methods. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,231,392
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,863
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,991
of 99,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.